Buffalo extends AHL agreement with Portland
Hockey Betting Lines
03/11/2010 -
Buffalo, NY (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - The Buffalo Sabres announced on Thursday that
the club has renewed its affiliate agreement with Portland of the American
Hockey League on a long-term extension.
"Greater Portland has embraced a group of world-class players, coaches and
team staff who have been and continue to be outstanding professionals and
people both on and off the ice," said Pirates CEO Brian Petrovek. "We're
looking forward to our future together with high hopes and expectations as we
continue to develop future Buffalo Sabres and compete for Calder Cup
championships."
Portland, nicknamed the Pirates, is currently in the second year of its
original deal with the Sabres. Buffalo's primary minor-league farm club had
been located in nearby Rochester from 1979 until the end of the 2007-08
season.
The Pirates had previously served as the AHL affiliate for the Washington Capitals and Anaheim Ducks.
<< Big Ten Conference Tournament Recaps
Indianapolis, IN (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Manny Harris scored a team-high 22 points
and pulled down nine rebounds as he led the Michigan Wolverines to a 59-52 win
over the Iowa Hawkeyes in the opening game of the 2010 Big Ten Conference
Tournam
<< Liverpool drops first leg at Lille
Lille, France (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Eden Hazard scored off a free kick with just
five minutes remaining and Lille edged Liverpool 1-0 on Thursday in the first
leg of their Europa League Round of 16 series at Lille Metropole.
Hazard curled a 2
<< Marquette trumps 'Nova to reach Big East semis
New York, NY (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Darius Johnson-Odom struck for 24 points,
thanks to 5-of-7 makes from beyond the arc, as Marquette upended 10th-ranked
Villanova, 80-76, in the quarterfinals of the Big East Tournament.
Lazar Hayward p
<< Cardinals re-sign OL Bridges
Tempe, AZ (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - The Arizona Cardinals re-signed guard/tackle
Jeremy Bridges to a three-year contract on Thursday.
Bridges signed a one-year deal with Arizona prior to last season and played in
all 16 games with the club, in
<< LeBron likely to return on Friday
Cleveland, OH (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - LeBron James will likely return to the court
when the Cleveland Cavaliers visit the Philadelphia 76ers on Friday.
James missed a loss to the Bucks last Saturday and a win over the Spurs on
Monday in an
Aggies top Nebraska, No. 1 Kansas up next in Big 12 semis >>
Kansas City, MO (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Donald Sloan finished with 23 points, as
No. 23 Texas A&M defeated Nebraska, 70-64, in the quarterfinals of the Big 12
Tournament.
Khris Middleton added 17 points while B.J. Holmes provided 11 poi
Volunteers vault past LSU into SEC quarterfinals >>
Nashville, TN (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Wayne Chism had 17 points and 10 rebounds as
15th-ranked Tennessee downed LSU, 59-49, in the first round of the SEC
Tournament.
Bobby Maze had 14 points and J.P. Prince added 11 points for the Vol
New Mexico wins 15th straight, advances in MWC tourney >>
Las Vegas, NV (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Darington Hobson erupted for 28 points and 15
rebounds, carrying No. 8 New Mexico to a hard-fought 75-69 victory over Air
Force in the quarterfinals of the Mountain West Conference Tournament.
Dairese Gar
Bills re-sign TE Klopfenstein >>
Orchard Park, NY (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - The Buffalo Bills re-signed tight end Joe
Klopfenstein on Thursday.
The Bills signed Klopfenstein two different times last season, and he played
in only one game, the season finale, making one catch for
Western Athletic Conference Tournament Recaps >>
Reno, NV (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Tai Wesley, one of three players to score 18
points for Utah State, collected 10 rebounds as the Aggies defeated Boise
State, 84-60, in the quarterfinals of the Western Athletic Conference
Tournam
What Is the Point Spread?
In any football or basketball game (the main sports that use point spreads) there are two teams playing against each other.
Those teams, though, are rarely exactly evenly matched – meaning that typically one team has a better chance than the other to win the game. If bettors were allowed to bet on who was simply going to win the game, smart ones would obviously bet on the better team (likely winning more than 50% of the time in the process).
If winning were that easy the Las Vegas and online sportsbooks would stop taking any bets! This is where the point spread comes in: the basic function of the point spread is to balance the likelihood of each team “winning” by adjusting the final score by the point spread. After this adjustment is made you get the Against The Spread result (ATS result for short).
Let’s look at Super Bowl XXXIX, New England Patriots vs. Philadelphia Eagles. Most people believed the defending champ Patriots to be the better team – so if betting were simply based upon which team would win the game, an uneven majority of people would have wagered on New England. But, by using the point spread, the bookmakers adjusted the terms of the bet, evening the proposition so about half the people believed the Pats to be the smart bet, while the other half considered Philly to be the smart bet.
How to Read Point Spreads
New England Patriots -7 vs. Philadelphia Eagles
The better team, called the Favorite, is expected to win the game and must “give” or “lay” points to the weaker team. The favorite is listed with a minus sign and the number of points they are favored by (e.g., New England -7)
In the case of our example, New England must not only win the game, but they must win by more than 7 points for Pats bettors to have a winning ATS result. An Eagles bettor wins his bet either if:
- Philly wins the actual game by any amount of points
OR
- Philly loses the game by less than 7 points.
-
There was also the possibility that the final score could land exactly on the spread number (for example, the Pats winning 28-21 when -7), which is called a “push” or “no action” and a refund is then issued to bettors of both teams.
The same game with the same point spread can be considered from the weaker team’s perspective: The Underdog (Philly in the case of our example) is not expected to win the game and online football betting thus receives or “gets” points given by the stronger team. When a game is stated from the underdog’s perspective the team is listed with a plus sign and the number of points they are underdogs by:
Philadelphia Eagles +7 vs. New England Patriots
Keep in mind that Philadelphia +7 and New England -7 is the same point spread on the same game, simply stated differently. The first is from the underdog’s perspective; the later is from the favorite’s.
For Those Who Like to Consider Things Mathematically
Not a must, but for some a mathematical approach is insightful. You can determine the ATS winner by either:
- Subtracting the point spread from the favorite’s score (thus the minus sign before the number) and then compare to the underdog’s score
OR
- Adding the point spread to the underdog’s score (thus the plus sign before the number) and then compare to the favorite’s score
Let’s look at the actual result of Super Bowl XXXIX: New England 24 Philadelphia 21
The favorite, New England, won the game but not by more than the point spread they were favored by (7), so the ATS result was a LOSS for Pats bettors.
Looking at it from the underdog’s perspective, Philly did not win the game, but they lost by less than the point spread (7), so the ATS result was a WIN for Eagle bettors.
Mathematically considered, 24 for the favorite Pats minus 7 equals 17, which is less than the 20 the Eagles scored, so the underdog Eagles win the ATS result (or you could figure 20 plus 7 equals 27 for the Eagles, which is more than 24 for the Pats).
Emily’s boyfriend understood the point spread and wagered $100 on the Eagles at +7. The Eagles may not have gotten a Super Bowl ring, but since they won the ATS result Emily’s boyfriend cashed his bet – giving him money to take her out to a nice dinner.
And now hopefully you understand how to read point spreads, putting you one step closer to joining the fun of sports betting.
To visit this internet sportsbook go to MySportsbook.com for all your football betting and World Series odds.
The 2007 college football rules changes that were implemented to shorten games are now history. The NCAA rules committee did what they set out to do; games were cut by an average of 14 minutes per game last season. There were also, on average, 14 fewer plays per game. We’ll get into how that did (or didn’t) affect games in regards to the pointspread a bit later.
While the NCAA rules committee may have had the betterment of the game in mind, they'll now “turn back the clock” for next season. Two key rules have now been overturned by the NCAA committee for the 2007 season, something definitely for the better.
For those of you who may not remember what those rules actually were, let us refresh your memory.
1) The first one was actually starting the clock on a kickoff as soon as the kicker touched the ball rather than waiting until the returner touched it. The problem here was near the end of the half (or game), if the team leading was kicking off, they could milk the clock by intentionally running offsides and then re-kicking. They could run 10-15 seconds off the clock each play while taking just five-yard penalties each time. They could run the clock down and simply cause the half (or game) to end on a kickoff, keeping the opposing offense off the field. In 2007, the clock will now start when the returner touches the ball as it had before last season.
2) The second rule dealt with starting the clock after a change of online football betting possession rather than waiting until the ball was snapped. This took a lot of time off the clock throughout the game as teams changed possession, however it caused the most problems late in games (or halves). Rather than huddling up and calling a play, the offensive team would have to rush onto the field as the clock started. This was a definite disadvantage to a team that was trying to come from behind late in the game. This year the clock will start on a change of possession, after the ball is snapped.
How did those rules affect the college game last year and will it make a difference this year when it comes to the pointspread? We commonly heard two theories when it came to these changes. First, it would affect scoring negatively. Second, it would hurt favorites as they would have less time and fewer plays to cover the number.
Did the rules hurt scoring? Yes. It seemed obvious that shortening the game by what amounted to 14 plays would push scoring downward. That was the case last year. Of the 119 Division 1A teams, 69 squads scored fewer points in 2007 than they did in 2005. Just 48 teams had a higher PPG scoring average and two stayed the same. Almost 59 percent of the teams in college football last year had a lower PPG average than they did in 2005. Expect more scoring in 2007 as we revert back to the old rules.
Did the rules hinder favorites from covering the number in 2007? Not really. Last year the favorites posted an overall spread record of 336-350-16 (48.9 percent). The year before, favorites were 316-326-13 (49.2 percent). In 2004, the favorites were 316-339-2 (48.2 percent). In fact, college football favorites have been above 50 percent for the season just once in the last seven years (in 2003). Last year’s numbers fell right in line with where they have been historically.
How about big favorites? The rules must have hurt them? Maybe a little bit. Double-digit favorites last year came in at a 47.8 percent clip compare with an average of just over 50 percent over the last seven years. Since 1980, favorites of -10 or more have covered at exactly a 50 percent clip (measured over 6,716 games).
Even bigger favorites must have struggled? Not really. In fact, it was just the opposite. Favorites of three TD’s or more were 59-54-2 last year (52.2 percent). Since 2000, those same favorites (-21 or higher) hit at 51.3 percent and since 1990 came in a clip of 50.3 percent. Stepping it up a notch to four TD favorites or higher, we actually see they've covered at a much better rate last season than before. Last year, favorites of -28 or more were 31-21-1, or almost 60 percent. Historically, four-TD-or-higher favorites have come in at a 50.7 percent spot since 2000 and only 48.9 percent since 1990. The “perceived” problem with the favorites covering at a reduced rate really never came to fruition.
Bottom line is, there might be some more scoring in 2007, but no real revelations when it comes to finding any pointspread golden nuggets.
To visit this online sportsbook got to MySportsbook.com for all your bet on college football needs. Mysportsbook.com online sportsbook accepts Visa and Mastercard credit cards.
|